Lord Of The Flies Vs Alive Essay free essay sample

, Research Paper Lord of the Fliess and Alive! In life we are all faced with state of affairss cheapnesss may be hard to cover with, but for most of us, seeking to last in hostile conditions is non one of them. In the novel The Lord of the Flies and in the film Alive! , seeking to last in hostile conditions was a similar job that the characters had to confront in order to last. We will write a custom essay sample on Lord Of The Flies Vs Alive Essay or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page The two scene, characters, and subject of these two plants have many similarities and many differences that cause these characters to respond otherwise towards each other and towards their state of affairs. What the characters did and how they reacted to one another throughout their ordeal proved this. The scene is a major issue that played an of import axial rotation in both of the literary plants. The scene is what helped organize the attitudes of some of the characters, and it was a guideline in what the characters had to make in order to last. In The Lord of the Flies the male childs were stranded in Eden with everything that they needed to last. They were able to play all twenty-four hours all twenty-four hours and non worry about how they were traveling to last, what they were traveling to eat, or even if they were traveling to be rescued. When the male childs lost sight of deliverance the society that had been created crumbled and accordingly they lost the common end that kept the male childs civilized and together. This was a black event because they lost hope and without hope, they became barbarian like. In the movie Alive! the male childs were all stranded in the Andes Mountains and they had to work together in order to last. Through the snowstorms, deficiency of nutrient and the decease of their fellow teammates the male childs banded together with the common end of deliverance and endurance. There was no nutrient so the characters had to fall back to cannibalism in order to last. In our society that is the lowest signifier of savageness, nevertheless the demand for endurance is what drove these male childs to make such unmentionable act. Through the difficult times the male childs worked together, and get the better of the adversities, or died. The rough conditions were what kept the male childs together and in bend kept them alive. The scene of these two plants was similar in the fact that they were stranded with no manner of being rescued on their ain. However, through the characters actions the scene besides set boundaries and limitations on what the male child could and could non make. In some ways, the two narratives had really similar characters. Nando and Jack had many similar features, such as their sense of escapade. They both had a manner of deriving power. At the beginning of the film Alive! Antonio, the rugger # 8217 ; s squad captain, had power over the group because of his leading back at place, in the same manner Ralph was voted head because he was the first one to happen the conch. Nando gained power by maintaining the of hope of acquiring out of the state of affairs that they were in by themselves, hence diminishing fright among the work forces and presenting the thought of cannibalism. Jack was besides concerned with nutrient and throughout the hunting, he gained more power. This besides helped to quiet the boy’s frights. They could kill hogs Jack told the male childs that he could protect them from any beastie that tried to assail them every bit long as he was in charge. These characters reacted in much of the same manner to their state of affairss, and through their actions they related to one another. In both narratives, the subject was the same, get the better ofing adversities in order to last and endurance of the fittest. In The Lord of the Flies, many adversities had to be overcome for the male childs to last. They were immature with no grownups on the island, they had no shelter from the heat, or from the rain and nutrient was at that place but meat was scarce. They overcame the deficiency of grownups through electing leaders and handling them, as they would handle an grownup. They built shelters and set together a runing party to acquire meat. They overcame these obstructions and throughout this, they were able to last and finally be rescued. In the movie Alive! the characters besides had to get the better of some of the same obstructions. They had to hold shelter, maintain warm, and acquire nutrient. They used what was left of the plane as shelter, and huddled together and found all the jumpers to maintain warm and they did the unmentionable act of eating each other to rema in alive. That is genuinely fall backing to whatever it takes to last. Both narratives besides show the subject of endurance of the fittest. In The Lord of the Flies those who were considered weak by Jack were either beaten or killed. So you had to be strong in order to last. In Alive! if you were non strong you would decease from the rough conditions or from hurt that took topographic point upon the clang. Those are the two chief subjects of these narratives. In both plants, the characters faced endurance. In The Lord of the Flies, endurance meant populating with Jack, and his huntsmans, in a really hostile environment. In Alive! the conditions, clime and nutrient were the chief issues that the characters had to cover with on the mountain. Both narratives show and prove that the strongest will last all odds. The Lord of the Fliess and Alive! have many similarities. They are both based on endurance. They show that in order to make your end, which in this instance was deliverance, you had to hold the will, and the chief characters in both of these narratives did hold the will to last. This was proven through the characters actions and how they reacted to one another in their state of affairs. 33c